I've bumped into a few norms and conventions lately that have really set me to thinking. (Hey, I have the time at the moment!) Mostly they have been ideas that just bother me in the abstract but then BG unearthed a real doozy, one that actually gets in my way and needs addressing.
Background: I cannot remember a time when I ever wanted to get married -- or to have children. In fact, I even told Mom this, so I already knew it by age twelve...
Now, I
have always thought it would be nice to have someone in your life. Someone to love, share with, lean into. But the structure I've pictured for that relationship has always been pretty free-form. I've never gotten tangled up in the societal norms that form the basic requirements for many couples.
In college, a guy friend suggested I might have better luck with guys if I "played the game a little more."
What game? What does that mean?
And why do I want to play at something I don't feel?
I was ... confused.
Shortly after graduation, I had a date with a man who had his PhD in Philosophy and double masters in Philosophy and Econ. This guy could analyze and
think -- I had high hopes. But then he spent the majority of the evening telling me that women were only after security and they basically lied to trick men into marriage. (Ah. The Game!)
The date ended with his arm around my shoulders and his face pointed 180 degrees away from me as he uttered the memorable words, "I'm really attracted to you but I don't know what to make of you."
He was ... confused.
I ushered him to the door with the injunction to call me if he ever figured it out, then sat back and thought, "Well, I may not play the game but at least I don't have to deal with
that idjit!"
But this is a situation I've run into time and time again. People are completely disconcerted by my lack of an orthodox approach to relationships -- and their confusion frustrates the dickens out of me. Every time.
I have never claimed to want any of the standard conventions attached to love, yet no matter how far you stay away from the field, no one ever believes you're not playing the game, anyhow.
It seems that societal norms are so pervasive that people frame you inside them, despite any and all words you might utter to the contrary. They cannot shake the conviction that "free spirited, single, and OK with it" is actually subliminal code for, "Desperately Looking For Someone To Move In With."
Even BG, with whom I've had this discussion many times, seemed to have fallen into this trap. Our latest Time of Troubles was over his very real concern that my eventual goal was cohabitation and constant companionship.
While beating my head against the wall, however, I finally knocked a realization loose:
In all our previous conversations, I had tried to explain what my requirements were and -- defend what they were not -- by using a word intrinsic to those very conventions I avoid.
I had said I wanted to be the girl friend as well as the fuck toy, without bothering to explain what "girl friend" meant to me!
Now, *I* knew that I was saying, "someone you care for" -
not "someone you plan on eventually settling down with" but how could I fault him for not grasping what I hadn't bothered to spell out? Especially since I know from experience how deeply ingrained those implicit assumptions can be. (Remind me again who the idjit is?)
With this new light bulb illuminating my thoughts, I poured out yet another email. This one shows signs of having succeeded. It seems there may be room to meet in the middle.
At least right now we're not ... confused.