A ponder brought to you by “The Book Club”… and an irksome friend.
A truth universally acknowledged: You can’t help who you’re attracted to.
And another: You can't control what your body likes.
OK - given.
What I find interesting, however, is how those attractions and preferences tend to morph over time. As I’ve said about 9 million thousand times (or so), I’m not a particularly physical person. What hooks me is something internal, not an external appearance, so my criteria have always encompassed a fairly broad spectrum. My beaux have few common features, be it build, hair color, ethnicity, or age. Even so, I’ve always been intrigued by how that spectrum keeps pace with me as I move through life.
Certainly, many of the qualities that catch my eye have remained the same - fixed points of attraction - but when it comes to the age of the bodies that house those qualities, well, the variations there have made for an amusing ponder over time. When I was in college, I liked guys who were about 10 years older; when I was in my thirties/forties, age was irrelevant to attraction… twenty-two years older to ten younger, if I liked you, I dated you. Now that sixty is so close I can feel its breath on my neck, the range is narrowing again. It's within about 6 years one way or the other - old coots and young whippersnappers need not apply.
When I hit 65, I’ll get back to you with the latest parameters…
But when you were younger, did you ever imagine that your tastes would keep pace with you like that? I don’t think I did. I think I assumed that love was the thing that made loose flesh bearable to the touch. (Which, of course, is partially true - except it’s “a” thing, not “the” thing.)
Truly, the realization that my preferences would change along with me was one of the grand discoveries of life. Which I suppose sounds hyperbolic but it really was genuinely encouraging. I am not someone who takes easily to doing things simply because they’re what you’re supposed to do, so the knowledge that “when it comes time to do this thing that currently disheartens me, I’ll likely feel very differently” took a lot of dread for the future away from me. (About many things actually but for the moment, let’s just stick to attraction.)
So I can sit in that movie theater, honestly (and happily!) drooling over a grizzled Andy Garcia and completely getting why Candice Bergen would yank balding Richard Dreyfuss into the back seat of her car - and barely registering the cute young guy.
Yet, it doesn’t work that way for everyone - which is another intriguing ponder.
I have a recently “re-singled” friend (“The Expat”) in his mid-60’s who has been keeping me up to speed on his search for a new companion. It’s not going all that smoothly for him and I finally could not hold my tongue any longer. “Perhaps you’d do better if you expand your search to include women over 20?”
“No… I’m not attracted to women over 30 and I’m looking for someone who’ll last my lifetime.”
(I am truly fond of this man… he’s extremely smart, very funny… but our entire 30+ years of friendship have found me continually about an inch away from smacking him into next week.)
It annoys the pants off of me - on behalf of women everywhere just on principle, but mostly because I want to think he’s better than this. My mind wants to argue that he should have grown out of this nonsense by now. (That’s shorthand for what could be a VERY long rant on my part.) He’s perpetuating an unpleasant stereotype and I hate it.
So we end up with me thinking he’s stunted and him figuring I’m just envious. And we are each both right and wrong. It's a point we'll never agree on because, maddeningly, how do you argue against, “This is what I find attractive”?
No conclusions here, it’s too messy and complicated of a question for that. Just a thought packet that’s been taking up a lot of space in my head lately…




